Virtual Education and Simulation in Endoscopy

Authors

  • David Zagalzky Instituto Quirúrgico del Callao. Centro de Educación Médica e Investigaciones Clínicas (CEMIC). Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires.
  • Andrés Wonaga Hospital de Clínicas José de San Martín, Universidad de Buenos Aires. Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52787/agl.v52i1.158

Abstract

The American Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) defines competency as the minimum level of skill, knowledge, and/or experience derived from training that will enable the proficient performance of a task or procedure.1

Training in gastrointestinal endoscopy, for most of us who are involved in it, was performed in hospitals during our residency or fellowship. The acquisition of competence required and still requires continuous supervision by tutors or mentors trained as teachers, and takes a long time to avoid errors or adverse events during the development of the learning curve.

The greater the complexity of the procedure, the greater the need for close supervision. Continuous supervision prolongs the procedures, thus reducing the number of procedures that can be programmed on a daily basis. This has financial implications for the institution and results in shift delays. It also has a cost in terms of equipment performance: when operated by inexperienced personnel, it encourages breakage due to incorrect use. On the other hand, current standards prevent, from an ethical point of view, doctors in training from using patients for training. What is the reason that makes guardianship necessary? For the patient who is the object of the procedure, the procedure is unique and unrepeatable - in general - and should be performed in the best possible way. That event for the individual patient is in principle unique.

References

- 1. ASGE Standards of Practice Committee, Faulx AL, Lightdale JR, Acosta RD, Agrawal D, Bruining DH, Chandrasekhara V, Eloubeidi MA, Gurudu SR, Kelsey L, Khashab MA, Kothari S, Muthusamy VR, Qumseya BJ, Shaukat A, Wang A, Wani SB, Yang J, DeWitt JM. Guidelines for privileging, credentialing, and proctoring to perform GI endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;85(2):273-281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2016.10.036

- 2. Kahn R, Scaffidi MA, Grover SC, Gimpaya N, Walsh CM. Simulation in endoscopy: Practical educational strategies to improve learning. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2019;11(3):209-218.

- 3. Kevin A. Waschke, John Anderson, Roland M. Valori, Donald G. MacIntosh, Joseph C. Kolars, James A. DiSario ASGE Principles of endoscopy training. Gastrointest Endosc 2019;90:27-34.

- 4. Singh S, Sedlack RE, Cook DA. Effects of simulation-based training in gastrointestinal endoscopy: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014;12:1611-1623.

- 5. Ziv A, Ben-David S, Ziv M. Simulation based medical education: an opportunity to learn from errors. Med Teachnol. 2005;27:193-199.

- 6. González Robinson D, Rodriguez AU, Buckel ES, Hernandez RC, Tejos RS, Parra AB, Pimentel FM, Boza CW, PadIlla O, Riquelme A. Systematization of a UGE training program for diagnosis in a simulation-based setting and learning curves in real patients. Gastroenterol. Latinoam. 2012;23(4):191-196.

- 7. Piskorz MM, Wonaga A, Bortot L, Linares ME, Araya V, Olmos JI, Gardey M, Perretta C, Olmos JA. Impact of a Virtual Endoscopy Training Curriculum in Novice Endoscopists: First Experience in Argentina. Dig Dis Sci. 2020 Nov;65(11):3072-3078. doi: 10.1007/s10620-020-06532-8

Published

2022-03-30

How to Cite

Zagalzky, D., & Wonaga, A. (2022). Virtual Education and Simulation in Endoscopy. Acta Gastroenterológica Latinoamericana, 52(1), 18–20. https://doi.org/10.52787/agl.v52i1.158